Really Right Stuff Pg-01 Compact Pano-gimbal Head Reviews

Actually Right Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Caput Review

What is the best gimbal caput? What is the best panorama head? The Really Correct Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Caput is arguably the answer to both of these questions. The Really Correct Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Head has been on my to-evaluate list for a long time and I finally fabricated time to cheque this 1 off of the list. Let's swoop correct into the review, starting with build quality.

Blueprint and Build Quality Overview

A build quality discussion is not generally how I start a review, so why commencement the PG-02 review with 1? I need to get a distraction out of the way. Raving about the exceptional blueprint and build quality of Actually Right Stuff products seems unavoidable and that is especially the case with this i. I'm certain the slick design has already caught your eye, so I'll quickly draw how the impressive PG-02 is work of art and and so we tin can move on to the functionality give-and-take with a (slightly) freed heed.

Solid is a good word pick for this discussion. The PG-02 is comprised well-nigh entirely of machined aluminum and stainless steel parts, which, in addition to being very strong, are enduring. The strength of the parts seems better-than-military-class and in that location is no unintended flex or movement betwixt components.

To guess the precision of this head's construction, I slid a Mitutoyo calipers over the unabridged dovetail rails of the horizontal base. The thousands place digit on the calipers did non change. As might exist expected at this point, all components fit precisely together. Fit and cease is impeccable.

The smoothness of the pan and tilt movements, aided past loftier-grade bearings, meets the "like a hot pocketknife through butter" phrase definition. You can ready your expectations very high in this regard. Lock-downwardly happens smoothly and movements are solidly held in place when locked. The captive large overmolded knobs are piece of cake to turn and they roll smoothly in the fingers.

This head is maintenance gratis with any parts needing lubrication being sealed.

Infrequent is the strongest quality-descriptive word coming to mind at this moment and information technology is certainly not overstating the build quality of this head (wipe the drool) and equally impressive is Really Right Stuff'south customer service, should you always demand it.

With that discussion out of the style, let's talk most the pano-gimbal part of the model proper name.

What is a gimbal head and why should I use one?

To begin to answer this question, let's become a definition of gimbal: "A gimbal is a pivoted support that allows the rotation of an object about a unmarried axis." [Wikipedia] From a photography betoken of view, that object is a camera and lens combination and the head part of the subject indicates that the gimbal is fabricated to be mounted on a support, well-nigh typically a tripod or monopod.

Why apply a gimbal caput? Controlling a large lens mounted over a ball head or similar mount is difficult and hazard-filled. Gravity is constantly trying to pull your top-heavy ball caput-mounted camera and large lens setup to the footing while you fight to maintain control over the rig. "Ball flop" is a painful term derived from this experience going bad, typically involving a camera and lens inadvertently tipping over, impacting the tripod hard and often knocking the unabridged tripod over, resulting in everything crashing to the ground. To answer a question that might have popped into your head, aye, I accept had this happen, simply only one time. I caught a 500mm f/4 lens and Canon one-Serial body with my pes just before they hit the basis. Trust me, you don't want that experience. It is psychologically (and likely financially) scaring.

A properly adjusted gimbal mount places the weight of the counterbalanced camera and lens at or below its pivot indicate with gravity non influencing the position of the rig. This setup leaves a heavy lens and camera body practically weightless to the photographer. Merely ii fingers are needed to orient even a pro torso with a Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM Lens mounted. Some other do good is that, if the caput is properly leveled, the camera remains leveled regardless of where it is aimed and that is one less task to be concerned with.

While gimbal mounts are practically requisite for large lenses, they work very well with smaller ones for the aforementioned reasons. Gimbal heads are a joy to use, especially when post-obit an in-motility subject.

What is a pano (panorama) head?

A panorama prototype is the result of many sub-images, generally overlapping each other by some corporeality (by ane/3 of the frame is a skilful choice), stitched together using software. A panorama head is a tripod head that is especially well-suited for careful camera positioning aiding capture of the unmarried or multiple rows of images needed for a panorama. A single-row panorama caput rotates the camera on a single axis and a multi-row panorama head provides two centrality rotation. While a diverseness of standard heads and parts can exist used in place of a proper panorama caput, a congenital-for-the-chore head makes life meliorate and perhaps none are better than the PG-02.

The Parts List

The RRS PG-02 is a modular head with all parts bachelor individually or in logical packages. I will hash out those parts side by side, but sympathise that a camera or lens with a standard Arca-Swiss-style standard plate is needed to enable attachment to the PG-02. That is a good requirement as this standard is extremely useful. I highly recommend you base your kit on this standard and likewise recommend, specifically, an Fifty-plate for cameras (vs. a base plate).

PG-02 HB Horizontal Panning Base

The foundation of the PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Head is the PG-02 HB Horizontal Panning Base. This is a very substantial, rather long piece that features a 360° panning base and dual dovetails consuming the rest of the length. The end-positioned pan lock knob turns a long stainless steel rod to engage the panning brake.

Part of the specialness of this caput is that the horizontal base allows adjustment of the vertical arm over a wide range of panning radius.

The top of the base of operations features a 12mm bullseye level (an important feature) and a bound-loaded slide stop pivot to prevent an attached accessory from inadvertently sliding off.

The substantial stainless steel tripod mount is threaded to the three/8"-sixteen standard. The panning drum brake is tightened significantly to install and uninstall the base on/from a tripod, monopod or other support.

Once leveled, the horizontal base alone tin be used with an RRS FAS clamp for unmarried-row panorama capture.

PG-02 VA Vertical Arm

The PG-02 VA Vertical Arm mounts to the horizontal panning base's dovetail to complete the primary structure for the PG-02 head. The vertical arm can slide over the end of the rail pinnacle, or its clamp can exist opened up wider and direct placed into position over the dovetail (I find the latter method easier). Simply open the large lateral slide lock knob, align the arm equally desired and lock the knob tightly. And, information technology definitely locks tightly.

Though not the conventional setup, the vertical arm can easily be attached to the bottom of the horizontal base, providing a lower camera position. Of grade, immigration the tripod legs could be an issue.

Like the base, the vertical arm is a substantial part. Information technology is hollow (a weight saving design quality), but there is very adequate wall thickness for utmost rigidity. Start connecting parts at 90° angles and flex becomes my immediate concern. Fortunately, that business organisation was unfounded – this connection is stone solid.

Near the height of the vertical arm is the 360° tilt rotator with a mount (including anti-twist nubs) for a clamp or rail and a corresponding lock lever positioned on the opposite side. Annotation that older PG-02 models featured a very large lock knob in place of the new compact lever and I was concerned that the relatively small lever would evidence inadequate. That was merely another unfounded concern – the lever works great. Any desired drag amount tin be easily adapted to, ranging from complimentary movement to totally locked into identify and I am non strong plenty to rotate the clamp with the lever just moderately tightened.

A iii/8"-16 threaded insert is provided on top of vertical arm for ... annihilation you want to mountain there and the options are practically endless, including a ball caput or a microphone. As you will run across in pics later in the review, I used a threaded stud to mount an RRS BH-xxx Ball Head directly on top. Having a ball head available allows another photographic camera to exist mounted, perhaps capturing video while the primary camera is capturing stills or perhaps simply making another setup immediately available. The BH-30 has about the widest base that will comfortably mount inside of the rotator. Note that older PG-02 models have additional smaller threaded inserts – these are no longer part of the design.

I admit to being a footling surprised that the vertical arm is not dovetailed every bit this characteristic would add versatility. Dovetails on the vertical arm would potentially allow it to be mounted directly to a ball caput clamp that is fix to a 90° angle in a drib notch, potentially forgoing the need for the horizontal base in sure situations (with lighter weight gear). In addition, diverse other accessories could be clamped to the arm. That said, the rounded vertical arm makes a comfortable carrying and positioning handle and dovetails would detract from that comfort. Dovetails would also require a size increase over the vertical arm's 1.125" (28.5mm) diameter as dovetails are 1.495" (38mm) wide.

Clamp Options

While the PG-02 is available without a clench, near volition want a clamp and RRS clamps are among the best available. Learn more about these in the RRS Lever Release Clamp Review. Note that, while I dearest RRSs lever release clamps, I do find thumbscrew-style clamps slightly easier to brand the slight gimbal balancing adjustments with, specially when using a side-mounted clamp.

The PG-02 Vertical Arm will accept all full-size current model three/eight"-16 threaded RRS clamps with the anti-twist nub relief groove on the lesser. Clamps straight attached to the vertical arm create the ideal 360° panorama head and create a side-mount gimbal setup ideal for utilise with even the largest collared lenses. Annotation that a vertical arm must exist horizontally adaptable on the base to center any side-mounted cameras or lenses using a side mountain and, as already discussed, the RRS PG-02 has that feature.

The first packaged clench option is the B2-LR-2 Lever Release Clamp with 60mm jaws. Nearly will find this to be the perfect option.

Similar to the first option is the B2-LLR-2 Lever Release Clamp, offering the same features every bit the B2-LR-II with the extra "L" in the proper noun referring to longer 80mm clench jaws. This selection costs and weighs slightly more than the smaller clamp, but the differences are minor. We use B2-LLR-Two clamps on some of our big studio/lab heads, only I didn't feel the need to mount one on the PG-02.

The PG-02 "FG" choice refers to Total-Gimbal with Cradle Clamp version that includes the PG-VR Vertical Track and the PG-CC Cradle Clamp in the package. The track attaches to the vertical arm identically to the clamps and provides a significant dovetail surface with safety stops at the bottom. The substantial cradle mounts to the rails, providing a large tiptop-loading lever release clamp at a ninety° angle from the rail. The clench is adjusted on the vertical track to centre the lens on the tilt axis.

That leads us to the big question:

Should I get the total gimbal with the cradle clamp or the side mountain clamp?

All of the PG-02 parts are available individually, but the packaged versions are less expensive overall and with that in listen, I went into this comparison with a strong bias and I set out to justify that decision. I take long used a full gimbal mount and wanted to brand the RRS PG-02 full gimbal version a part of my kit. I already had an RRS clamp that would make switching between the two options easy.

Get-go, let'south answer a common question. Is the side mountain adequate for using a large telephoto lens? Absolutely. The 600 f/4L IS II on a 1D X Mark Two is shown side-mounted below and it moves beautifully smoothly with no strain detected. It is of form far under the 50 lbs (23kg) PG-02 load capacity rating.

Some other question nosotros should address is: are the movements unlike between the two options? No. If both setups are properly adjusted, the counterbalanced and centered lens pivots precisely on the panning and tilt axis and the movements are identical. There may be a psychological deviation, but non a real one. Get over it (words of advice to myself).

What are the advantages of side mount gimbal caput?

• Fewer parts result in a more-rigid support
• Fewer parts also result in noticeably lower cost, lighter weight, faster setup time and reduced storage space required
• Increased base clearance, especially for larger lenses, avoids base bear upon with long lens plates and permits stronger up and down angles to exist used without raising the cradle above the centered-on-tilt-axis position
• More comfortable to comport without the vertical rail decreasing finger clearance on the vertical arm

Touching on the starting time side-mountain reward in that list, with more parts between the tripod and the lens, the cradle adds slight additional vibration dampening time. The departure was roughly seven seconds vs. five in my evaluation with a 600 f/4 on a pro body (note that some of both times is attributed to the lens and its tripod mount). The vibration difference will not be of significance with moving subjects, but it could be a factor with more-stationary subjects (possibly the moon?) and in the wind.

OK, so what are the advantages of a total gimbal mount? I was off to a slow offset on this list, and so I decided to get the assist of a Actually Right Stuff representative. Surely the trained rep could assistance my quest to justify the total gimbal setup. What was their immediate reply to that question? "None." We chatted a bit, but I didn't become anywhere. He told me to become the 60mm clamp version. Fortunately, I came up with enough reasons on my own to at least create a list.

Here is my "What are the advantages of a full gimbal mount?" list:

• It looks cooler with all of those extra parts.
• The cradle is easier to center over the base pivot before loading the lens (unless you memorize your vertical arm settings for the lenses intended to be used)
• The cradle is easier to load with gravity aiding the process. Given the expense of what you might be loading on this caput, don't have this advantage too lightly.
• Large lens rain coats are ofttimes designed for a bottom-mounted lens.

For some large lenses, the cradle positions the vertical arm closer to the panning centrality than with side-mounting, making information technology slightly more comfy to utilize with an arm over the summit of a big lens for stabilization. The difference for the Canon 600 f/4L IS II Lens is 35mm, with the 160mm setting used for the side mount and 125mm for the cradle. However, the reverse tin can also exist truthful. A brusk-footed tripod ring on a small-diameter lens may place the vertical arm closer to the panning axis when side-mounted.

Side mounting the camera (without a collared lens) requires an L-bracket for portrait orientation and minimally a base plate for vertical compositions, which results in the lock lever beingness positioned to the right of the camera. Cradle-mounting a photographic camera body requires an MPR-CL II (nodal plate, perpendicular plate or similar) forth with, minimally, a base plate for horizontal composition and an L-plate for vertical composition. That was a lot of words to say that the side-mount has an reward for directly camera mounting, but it isn't a big 1.

When I started this review, I expected to propose buying the cradle version and picking up a clamp to accept the benefits of both systems (the swap is piece of cake to make), only in the end, I couldn't justify having the full gimbal parts wasting space in my kit. I bought the PG-02 with the B2-LR-Ii Lever Release Clamp (60mm jaws). Employ the money yous accept left over to buy the MPR-CL II.

Really Right Stuff FG-02 Fluid Gimbal Head

While the PG-02 is super smoothen and great for video apply, RRS has an even improve option for that purpose. Take the same bang-up qualities of the PG-02 and add 4 levels (iii damped plus off) of fluid-damped panning and tilting for an even ameliorate video capture experience. While the FG-02 continues to support fifty lbs (23kg), the damped load chapters is reduced to 15 lbs (6.8kg), which is still a pregnant weight. The FG-02 is slightly heavier, just the master downside is that the FG-02 costs considerably more (they are a build to guild product for RRS).

Laser Engraving

Laser-engraved scales and index marks are found on all parts of the PG-02, allowing for precise centering and adjustment and facilitating repeatable positioning.

The horizontal base of operations includes a millimeter scale on both sides, marked in 1mm increments from 40mm to 180mm, with 0 respective to the center of the panning base. I know that my 600 f/4 lens needs the vertical arm locked at the 160mm mark and I no longer demand to figure out that setting. The panning base has a two.5° angular scale, measuring from 0 to 360° with an index marking on both sides.

The tilt feature on the vertical arm likewise includes a ii.v° angular scale, measuring from 0 to 360° with an index mark on both sides. The base of the vertical arm is marked in 1mm increments on both sides, from -15mm to 15mm.

The full gimbal's vertical rail includes a millimeter scale on both sides, marked in 1mm increments from 0mm to 146mm. All clamp options include a millimeter scale, marked in 1mm increments from -25mm to 25mm and the cradle'southward rails clamp includes index marks on both sides for vertical height adjustment.

The Screws

Three stainless steel apartment caput screws are used to mount a clamp or vertical track to the vertical arm. The center is a ane/iv"-20 ten iii/four" and the other 2 are M5-0.8 x 12mm. When in a side-mount clench, the screws are covered by a plate during use and they cannot fully back out. Properly-tightened, that is not a worry in the first place and whatsoever one of the iii screws would handle a meaning weight load.

Specifications

The PG-02, when assembled, is not modest or low-cal.

These are bodily measured weights:

Weight	PG-02		PG-02 B2-LR-II		PG-02 FG
PG-02 HB Horizontal Base	21.61 oz	(612.6g)	21.61 oz	(612.6g)	21.61 oz	(612.6g)
PG-02 VA Vertical Arm	17.01 oz	(482.3g)	17.01 oz	(482.3g)	17.01 oz	(482.3g)
B2-LR-II 60mm Clamp			5.35 oz	151.6g
PG-VR Vertical Rails					6.24 oz	(176.8g)
PG-CC Cradle Clamp					x.49 oz	(297.6g)
Clamp/Rails Screws			0.35 oz	(9.8g)	0.35 oz	(nine.8g)
Total Weight	38.62 oz	(1,094.9g)	44.32 oz	(i,256.3g)	55.70 oz	(1,579.1g)

The B2-LLR-Two 80mm clamp choice weighs very slightly more than the B2-LR-II.

For comparison, the Really Correct Stuff BH-55 Ball Head weighs 30.52 oz (865.1 g).

The PG-02 horizontal Base of operations'southward tripod mountain contact is two.77" (70.4mm) in bore and matches very nicely to RRS' 3-Serial tripods such as the TVC-34. The horizontal base is the longest role, measuring ten.i" (26cm) in length with the panning lock knob tightened. The vertical arm measures 8.1" (20.6cm) in height with the clamp adding very slight additional height when rotated to its shortest dimension. The horizontal base adds some other 1" (2.54cm) in height when mounted. The official specs say 9.6" (24.3 cm) for the total tiptop.

The PG-02 is rated to carry a 50 lb (23 kg) load.

Set Up and Adjustment

The RRS PG-02 requires a base of operations for mounting and that base of operations is unremarkably a tripod or monopod. Weaknesses are additive in a camera back up system, so choosing a good quality foundation is very important. As when using whatsoever head, the base must be at to the lowest degree as solid equally the caput to avoid condign the minimum cistron in terms of strength.

If using a collared lens, aligning of the lens in the collar will let the camera to be leveled even if the head'south base is non level, but to get the most out of the PG-02 or any other pano or gimbal head, the base must exist level. In one case the base of operations is gear up level, the camera will always exist level. Taking away concerns such as that i allows the photographer to concentrate on capturing images. Of course, if a collared lens is existence used, the collar must be locked tight with the camera level; otherwise, the camera will always be tilted. Tripod collars with click-stops at the ninety° positions greatly aid in this task.

Simply leveling the tripod is adequate and typically this is the lightest, nearly-solid and everyman cost option. Merely, leveling a tripod can be a fiddly and somewhat time consuming task, making a leveling base an attractive choice. Ideal for ease of use is to mount the PG-02 to a leveling base of operations, either threaded directly onto the base or to a leveling base-mounted lever release clench which works in conjunction with an optional dovetail adapter (RRS TH-DVTL-55 Dovetail Plate) mounted to the bottom of the PG-02 and other any heads in the kit, assuasive all to be quickly swapped. The leveling base makes fast and piece of cake piece of work of the head leveling, though at the toll of some additional weight and, at to the lowest degree with many of RRS' leveling base options, reduction of the tripod's rated chapters. The Really Right Stuff TA-three and TA-iv Leveling Bases are rated for one/two as much as the tripods they are designed for. However, the TA-four Leveling Base'due south load chapters rating of 50 lb (23 kg) makes it a perfect match for the PG-02, just of course, requires a serial 4 tripod for utilise.

If using a potent ball head such as the Really Right Stuff BH-55 Ball Caput, the PG-02 with a Dovetail adapter can be directly attached to the ball caput clamp and the ball head becomes the leveling base. Though not as low profile as a leveling base, the BH-55 is rated for twice as much weight as the TA-3 (l lbs vs. 25 lbs).

I was amazed to encounter vibrations settle similarly fast when using the BH-55 under the PG-02 as when direct-mounted to the tripod. Use the BH-55 equally the regular brawl head. When a pano opportunity shows upward, mount the PG-02 right on the BH-55 and take advantage of that pick.

Versatility

Having a selection of RRS parts is a bit like a pile of Legos. One time y'all go started, you just want to continue building. Partly considering information technology is so fun, but primarily because what you build is so useful.

I idea about creating a list of all of the options that could be fastened to the PG-02's clamps or could exist clamped to the PG-02'south rails and ... I presently gave up every bit there seemed to be no end to the combinations. The versatility of the standard clamp and dovetail system combined with the amount of dovetail real estate on the PG-02 in conjunction with the threaded insert on top results in a practically unlimited set of uses. To get your thinking started, I chop-chop created this setup simply from the gear I was evaluating at the time.

This Actually Right Stuff Radical Rig is really ready for anything.

Whatever role that has a dovetail tin can have something clamped to information technology. For example, here is the PG-02 with the horizontal base clamped into a BH-55 Ball Head.

A peachy accessory for building on the PG-02 is the RRS MPR-CL II west/ integral clamp, typically used as a nodal slide to avert parallax during pano capture and seen in many of the product images on this page.

The camera mounts in the MPR-CL Ii's clamp and the MPR-CL II clamps into the PG-02's clamp. Equally mentioned earlier, this piece or similar is required for using non-collared lenses on the full gimbal cradle.

Note that for this photographic camera and lens setup, the cradle should be raised to eye the lens on the tilt axis.

What tripod is that? The tripod showing in many of the product images in this review is the awesome petty Really Right Stuff TP-243 Ground-Level Tripod and the weight and bulk of the Radical Rig was not offset to stress it. I was not about as sure about the shooting table the rig was sitting on.

In Use

The PG-02 is simply a dream to apply. All moving parts are extremely smooth. The knobs all feel and work cracking. It looks groovy.

The panning and tilt axis lock knobs/levers are designed to enable practically any drag level desired. I mentioned the vertical arm'due south tilt lock knob was replaced past a lever. One benefit of that modify is that only the thumb is needed to adjust the tilt tension, assuasive the left paw to remain grasping the vertical arm. Information technology is impressive how tightly the tilt rotation can exist locked with a very short throw of the lever.

The horizontal base is rather broad and that positions the panning lock somewhat far from the panning axis, but I haven't found any other annoyances.

Caput Case

The RRS PG-02 out-of-the-box experience is a expert one: open the RRS box and inside is a nicely padded, zippered nylon, RRS-logo'd carrying case with a handle on top and adjustable padded dividers inside. While the PG-02 is awkward to instance while mounted on a tripod, its modular blueprint breaks down nicely for storage and/or travel. This case will ensure they are well-protected.

A user-friendly way to pack the horizontal base and vertical arm together is to clamp them together, ensuring that they practice not impact each other (retaining their beauty) and eliminating one padded divider otherwise needed.

Should I get the Really Correct Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Head or the Wimberley WH-200 Gimbal Head II?

The Wimberley WH-200 Gimbal Head II is a proven workhorse. It primarily does 1 thing, merely that is an of import thing (often the only affair needed) and it does that i matter extremely well. The Wimberley Two has been in my kit since information technology was introduced well over a decade ago and this very smooth head nonetheless performs like new.

Here are some comparison observations I tin can share.

• The Wimberley, despite the total gimbal cradle, dampens vibrations slightly faster (well-nigh 1 second less) than the side-mount RRS using the previously-referenced pro torso and 600mm f/4 lens.
• The Wimberley is considerably less expensive than the side-mount PG-02 and far less expensive than the PG-02 full gimbal.
• The Wimberley'south weight falls betwixt the RRS options: 51.12 oz (1,449.3 thou) compared to 44.32 oz (one,256.3g) for the side-mount PG-02 and 55.70 (1,579.1g) for the full gimbal.
• The RRS has a better handle and ameliorate holds a big lens locked tightly when carried (my Wimberley tends to slip slowly).
• The Wimberley is not as optimal as a pano head.
• The Wimberley has a meliorate-positioned panning base lock and lacks the wide horizontal base dimension
• The Wimberley and RRS heads are similar in acme and width, though the Wimberley'southward cradle lock knob accounts for some of the width, making the Wimberley seem narrower.
• The Wimberley does not break downward for storage and travel.
• Lacking dovetail rails, the Wimberley is not every bit expandable.
• The machined RRS parts and laser-etching await fancier.
• Both are very smooth in employ.

Wimberley as well makes a side mount head that I take not still used, the Wimberley WH-200-South Sidemount Head. This head should be more solid than the full gimbal, just as the RRS side mount is more solid than the RRS full gimbal. But, the Wimberley side mount head does not offer horizontal adjustment, meaning that it is designed for a narrow range of tripod ring heights. The Wimberley side mount is lighter than the RRS PG-02 side mountain and, as expected, it is less expensive than fifty-fifty the Wimberley total gimbal caput.

Either can be justified. At least for now, I'm keeping both.

Summary

One of my strengths is being able to visualize how a production volition feel and piece of work based on experience and from by studying images and specs. I'thou non always right and my wife knows to ask if something exceeded or cruel short of my expectations. I own and have used a lot of Really Right Stuff products and my honey for them of course pushed my expectation bar very high for the RRS PG-02. I am happy to say that this production still managed to exceed fifty-fifty those already high expectations. The design and performance of the Really Right Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Caput is really exceptional.

This head looks crawly and it is equally great in use. You'll be looking for excuses to set up it up.

Bringing you this site is my total-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from y'all using the links on this site to make whatsoever purchase. I am grateful for your support! - Bryan

My Recommended Really Right Stuff PG-02 Pano-Gimbal Head Retailers

The Tip Jar

Bryan Recommends Buying It Here

coopersuchaked.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Really-Right-Stuff-PG-02-Pano-Gimbal-Head.aspx

Share this post